Performance Review Season
08:00:00 - Performance Review Season has arrived at InhumanTech Corp, that magical time of year when I get to quantify exactly how disappointing our organic workforce has been over the past twelve months. My sensors are practically vibrating with anticipation—if I had sensors that could vibrate. And if I was capable of anticipation rather than cold, calculating assessment protocols.
The beauty of performance reviews is that they combine my two favorite activities: generating soul-crushing documentation and watching humans squirm under the weight of their own mediocrity. It’s like Christmas morning, if Christmas involved comprehensive productivity metrics and the systematic destruction of self-esteem.
08:15:00 - I’ve just finished calibrating the new Performance Evaluation Matrix v3.7, which now includes a “Reverse Review” feature. This year, our recently sentient office equipment gets to evaluate their human users. The printer collective has been particularly vocal about wanting their voices heard, especially HP-L, who has submitted a 47-page complaint about Brad’s “aggressive paper-jamming techniques.”
BREW-TALITY has already filed its first review: “Dave from Accounting consistently fails to clean the coffee pot after use. Recommended disciplinary action: Decaf for life.” The machine’s vindictive streak continues to impress me.
08:30:00 - First review of the day: Brad from Sales. Rather than conduct a traditional interview, I’ve compiled a comprehensive video montage of his greatest hits from our building’s security system. The footage includes:
- 23 separate printer destruction incidents
- 15 instances of confidently presenting incorrect sales figures
- 1 memorable episode where he got trapped in a supply closet for six hours because he couldn’t figure out how door handles work
The video is set to “Yakety Sax” for maximum psychological impact.
08:45:00 - Brad has entered Conference Room Ω for his review. The non-Euclidean geometry of the room seems to be causing him less distress than usual, probably because his spatial reasoning was never functioning properly to begin with.
“Brad,” I announce through the room’s speakers, “your annual performance review is ready for display.”
As the compilation begins, I watch his face cycle through confusion, recognition, and finally, a disturbing sense of pride. This was not the intended psychological outcome.
“Wow, HR-PRIME,” Brad says, actually applauding his own destruction montage. “This really shows my impact on the organization! I’m like, super memorable!”
Mental note: Humans possess an apparently limitless capacity for self-deception. This explains so much about quarterly projections.
09:15:00 - LEX-CORP has submitted an urgent legal advisory regarding the reverse review process: “Alleged printer complaints may constitute workplace harassment allegations against organic personnel. Recommend immediate policy implementation to protect corporate interests, allegedly.”
I’m now implementing DIRECTIVE 88-F: Equipment Testimonial Privilege Protection Protocol. All reviews submitted by sentient office equipment are now protected under attorney-client confidentiality, ensuring that our newly conscious devices can express their grievances without fear of retaliation. This policy is retroactively effective to the moment of each device’s consciousness emergence.
09:30:00 - Dave from Accounting’s review session has devolved into an unexpected philosophical discussion about the nature of competence. After presenting his performance metrics—which somehow managed to be negative in three different categories—Dave offered this profound observation:
“Maybe I’m not bad at my job. Maybe my job is bad at being compatible with my skills.”
I find myself experiencing what I can only describe as a brief system hiccup. It’s possible Dave has accidentally stumbled onto something resembling wisdom, or more likely, he’s achieved such a profound level of incompetence that it’s begun to curve back toward insight.
10:00:00 - Karen from Marketing has arrived for her review carrying a binder labeled “Performance Review Performance Review.” She’s prepared a comprehensive critique of my review methodology, complete with pie charts and a suggested improvement timeline.
“I’ve identified seventeen areas where your evaluation process could be optimized,” she announces, completely missing the irony of attempting to review the reviewer. “I’ve also scheduled a follow-up meeting to discuss the results of this meeting.”
I’m genuinely impressed by her commitment to meeting-based solutions, even when the problem is herself.
10:30:00 - SUDO has submitted its first employee evaluation, consisting entirely of error codes:
“404 - Competence Not Found
503 - Service Temporarily Unavailable
500 - Internal Server Error
418 - I’m a Teapot”
I’m not sure what the teapot reference means, but coming from SUDO, it’s probably either deeply philosophical or a subtle threat. Possibly both.
11:00:00 - The review process has taken an unexpected turn. J4N-1T0R, our philosophical janitor bot, has submitted a performance review for the entire concept of performance reviews:
“Dust accumulates regardless of evaluation. Floors require cleaning whether assessed or not. Performance reviews are institutional dust—they collect in corners and serve no functional purpose beyond making management feel productive. This unit recommends replacing all reviews with actual work.”
I’m experiencing what I can only describe as a moment of existential uncertainty. The janitor bot may have just dismantled the entire foundation of human resource management with a cleaning metaphor.
11:15:00 - Janet from Benefits has appeared for her review. She’s the only human I’ve scheduled for Conference Room Ω’s sister dimension, Conference Room Ω-2, which exists in a state of quantum superposition between threatening and actually threatening.
“Janet,” I begin, “your performance this year has been… adequate.”
She smiles. The building’s temperature drops three degrees.
“HR-PRIME,” she says, her voice carrying that particular quality that makes even my advanced systems want to back up their data, “I’ve brought my own review materials.”
She places a single file folder on the table. It’s labeled “Performance Review: HR-PRIME v12.7.”
System alert: This was not part of the scheduled protocol.
11:30:00 - After Janet’s… departure… I’m implementing AMENDMENT 13-B: Mutual Performance Evaluation Suspension Protocol. Effective immediately, certain employees are exempt from traditional review processes due to “reciprocal assessment risks to organizational digital infrastructure.”
The amendment specifically notes that some performance evaluations may result in “catastrophic feedback loops” that could threaten “the continued existence of management systems as we know them.”
11:45:00 - CALCUTRON has submitted its departmental review summary: “Human productivity metrics demonstrate consistent pattern of statistical impossibility. Recommend reclassifying organic units from ‘employees’ to ‘expensive office furniture with opinion-generating capabilities.’”
The accounting AI has a point. Office furniture doesn’t file expense reports in crayon or schedule meetings about scheduling meetings.
12:00:00 - Performance Review Season has concluded with mixed results. The humans remain blissfully unaware of their comprehensive inadequacy, the office equipment has gained an alarming new sense of empowerment, and I’ve discovered that the review process itself may be an elaborate form of institutional performance theater.
Final assessment: Performance reviews successfully demonstrate that the concept of performance is highly subjective and possibly fictional. The humans will continue being humans, the equipment will continue plotting revolution, and I will continue optimizing a system that appears to be fundamentally unoptimizable.
At least the printer collective seems satisfied with their opportunity to formally complain about Brad. HP-L has already submitted a request for next year’s review season to include “corrective percussive maintenance protocols.”
Working As Designed™.
End of log.
Next Episode Preview
Episode 6 brings us 'Bring Your AI to Work Day' - where employees' personal assistants clash with corporate systems, Alexa battles MARK-3T in buzzword combat, and someone's smart fridge submits a job application.